Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 9 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
State Of Bihar vs Dhirendra Kumar & Ors on 27 April, 1995
9. Learned counsel further submits that the learned courts
below had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit under section 9 of the Code
DIVYANSHI
2026.01.22 11:10
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
RSA-1069-2023(O&M) -5-
of Civil Procedure, 1908 as any issue regarding Land Acquisition must be
dealt under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 itself. The said issue has been
dealt by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case titled as State of Bihar versus
Dhirendra Kumar, 1995 (RCR) 539 (SC).
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
M/S.Shivali Enterprises Etc. vs Smt. Godawari (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. on 13 September, 2022
16. Even otherwise, present Second appeal is liable to be
dismissed on the short ground that this Court in Regular Second Appeal
has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the concurrent findings of facts
returned by the learned Courts below. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in
M/s. Shivali Enterprises v. Godawari (Deceased) (SC): Law Finder Doc Id
# 2034559 has held that no matter howsoever incorrect or grossly
erroneous the concurrent findings of the learned courts below may be,
this Court in the Second Appeal can interfere in the concurrent findings
only where there is an error in law or procedure. In the present case, no
such error in law and procedure has been made out by learned counsel
for the appellant.
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
1