Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.37 seconds)

M. Ramayya vs The State Of Madras, Represented By The ... on 30 August, 1951

In Ramayya v. State of Madras (2), a division Bench, consisting of Govinda Menon and Ramaswami Oounder, JJ,, considered the question whether the proceedings under Art. 226 of the Constitution are in exercise of the original Jurisdiction or revisional jurisdiction of the High Court, and the learned Judges held that the power to issue writs under Art. 226 of the Constitution is original and the jurisdiction exercised is original jurisdiction.
Madras High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 31 - Full Document
1   2 Next