Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (4.22 seconds)Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 103 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Specific Relief Act, 1963
Malayalam Plantations Ltd vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 9 November, 2010
Adducing additional evidence is in the interest of justice. Evidence relating to
subsequent happenings or events which are relevant for disposal of the appeal,
however, it is not open to any party, at the stage of appeal, to make fresh
allegations and call upon the other side to admit or deny the same. Any such
attempt is contrary to the requirements of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. Additional
evidence cannot be permitted at the appellate stage in order to enable the
other party to remove certain lacunae present in that case.
Union Of India vs Ibrahim Uddin & Anr on 17 July, 2012
6. The learned counsel for the Respondent relied on the decision in Union
of India V. Ibrahim Uddin2, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that:
Chapala Chinnabbayi And Ors. vs Naralasetti Anusuyama And Ors. on 7 December, 2005
8. The learned counsel on either side relied on the decision in Chapala
Chinnabbayi and Ors. V. Naralasetti Anusuyama and Ors.3, wherein the
composite High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that:
K.Venkataramiah vs A. Seetharama Reddy & Ors on 12 February, 1963
(i) In K.Venkataramiah V. A. Seetharama Reddy 4 , the Hon'ble
Supreme Court held that:
Karnataka Board Of Wakf vs Government Of India & Ors on 16 April, 2004
(ii) In Karnataka Board of Wakf V. Govt. of India 5, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court held that: