Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.02 seconds)The Essential Commodities Act, 1955
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sarkari Sasta Anaj Vikreta Sangh Tahsil ... vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. on 25 August, 1981
The Supreme Court in Sarkari Sasta Anaj Vikreta Sangh v. State of Madhya Pradesh, held that "no one can claim a right to run a fair price shop as an agent of the Government. All that he can claim is the right to be considered for appointment as an agent of the Government to run a fair price shop".
Madhya Pradesh Ration Vikreta Sangh, ... vs State Of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal And Anr. on 13 April, 1981
Similar is the principle laid down by the Court in M.P. Ration Vikreta Sangh Society v. State of Madhya Pradesh, .
Jagarlamudi Lakshminarayana vs District Collector And Ors. on 29 August, 1996
In a slightly different context, a division Bench in Jagarlamudi Lakshminarayana v. District Collector, Ongole, observed that "A person, who distributes essential commodities to the card holders, comes into contact with large number of people who approach him for purchase of essential commodities. Unless the distributor is a man of good character, the image of the Government would be subjected to inconveniences and also hardships.
1