Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.28 seconds)
K.Subramani vs The Commissioner Of Police on 28 November, 2023 cites

V. Krishnan vs G. Rajan Alias Madipu Rajan And The ... on 2 December, 1993

(i) The lead case is V.Krishnan's case [V.Krishnan Vs. G.Rajan alias Madipu Rajan reported in 1994-1-L.W. 89]. In this case, one parent had made an application for Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP), the same was repelled by the Court and the most relevant portions of this Judgment which has been penned after taking into account view points of several religious scriptures, English and American Laws are articulated in paragraphs 43, 48 and 51 to 54, conclusion and directives are contained in paragraph 55 which are as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

S. Varadarajan vs State Of Madras on 9 September, 1964

(iv) In S.Varadarajan Vs. State of Madras reported in 1964 SCC OnLine SC 36, a three member Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court had made an observation regarding a minor aged about 16 to 17 years, who went away on her own volition from the custody of her lawful guardian https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 35/42 H.C.P(MD)No.1240 of 2023 that 'she was not a child of tender years who was unable to think for herself but, as already stated, was on the verge of attaining majority and was capable of knowing what was good and what was bad for her.' In the case on hand, the minor is aged 17 years (Date of Birth is 17.09.2006). Therefore, the observation made by Hon'ble Supreme Court squarely applies to the case on hand. More so, in the light of Doctors' opinion that her judgmental capability is intact and her cognitive skills are good.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 778 - J R Mudholkar - Full Document

T.Sivakumar vs The Inspector Of Police on 3 October, 2011

In this very T.Sivakumar's case, Hon'ble Full Bench also made it clear that while a minor girl cannot be allowed to walk away from the legal guardianship of her parents, equally if she expresses her https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 36/42 H.C.P(MD)No.1240 of 2023 desire to the contrary ie., not to go with parents, the Court cannot compel her to go to the custody of her parents and instead the Court may entrust her custody to a fit person or entity subject to her volition.
Madras High Court Cites 58 - Cited by 13 - K N Basha - Full Document
1   2 Next