Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)

Sukadev Rout vs Abali Bewa And Ors. on 5 March, 2007

As regards the judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the respondents in Sukadev Rout's case (supra), it has been held that Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of the CPC stipulates that if a document, which ought to be produced in the Court, has not been produced, the same shall not be accepted in evidence without leave of the Court. Therefore, the plaintiff cannot compel the defendants to file the document in support, as consequence of non-filing of such document is specified in Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of the CPC which prescribes that if the document is not filed, it would not be received by the Court at the time of hearing of the suit, without the leave of the Court.
Orissa High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - A S Naidu - Full Document
1