Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.75 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. on 21 November, 1990

6.8 In the case of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (supra), it has been held that an income accrues when the assessee gets a legal right to enforce the amount against the debtor. In this sense, income might have accrued in different years but by dint of fiction contained in section 45(1), income accruing in different years or received in different years is chargeable in the year in which transfer takes place.
Calcutta High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 30 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat vs Ashokbhai Chimanbhai on 20 October, 1964

The Court was clear that Section 45 is the charging section and ordinarily acquires primacy whereas Section 48 is merely computing mechanism. However, the Court at the same time said that in order to arrive at chargeability of taxation both the sections have to be looked into and read together. There cannot be any quarrel with that proposition. Equally, the decision of Ashokbhai Chimanbhai (supra) was in the context of disruption of Hindu Undivided Family where profits of business have to be accounted for in different periods. The observations made by the Court as to what constitutes accrued for the purpose of income tax no doubt would apply but at the same time this Court notices that they are of a general character.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 162 - J C Shah - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bangalore ... vs B. C. Srinivasa Setty, Etc. Etc on 19 February, 1981

5. The appellant‟s counsel relied upon the judgments cited before the Tribunal. He submits that decision of the Supreme Court in CIT Vs. B C Srinivasa Shetty, AIR 1981 SC 972 = (1981) 128 ITR 294 (SC) lays down that the provisions of Section 45 are not to be read in isolation but have to be read along with Section 48 which have to be ITA 423 of 2012 Page 7 of 10 considered by the Court in order to arrive at the true nature of the transactions. Particular emphasis was given to the following observations :
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 859 - R S Pathak - Full Document
1