Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (3.49 seconds)Laxmishankar Harishankar Bhatt vs Yashram Vasta (Dead) By L.Rs. on 26 February, 1993
In fact,
relying upon the decision of the Apex Court in Laxmishankar Harishankar
Bhatt v. Yashram Vasta [AIR 1993 SC 1587], the learned counsel for the
appellants submitted that only if the particular details of persons are made
available, the plaintiff can be compelled to bring them in the record.
According to us, the learned counsel is well justified in making the said
submissions. The sixth respondent in the written statement raised the plea
that the deceased Raman had other legal heirs in Ceylon but no details of
the persons have been given, except their names. As far as the brother of
the plaintiff is concerned, the same has been clarified in the re-
examination. Therefore, we reverse the finding made by the court below
that the suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties.
Bharatha Matha & Anr vs R. Vijaya Renganathan & Ors on 17 May, 2010
20. But we find from the discussion of the facts in Bharatha
Matha's case [AIR 2010 SC 2685] that Their Lordships of the Apex Court
reversed the finding of the High Court therein, by drawing a presumption, in
a similar manner, on the particular facts of the case. Therein, after
discussing the evidence, the Apex Court found that, defendant No.1, one
Rengammal had been married to Alagarsami Reddiar and, therefore, the
presumption of marriage with Muthu Reddiar, who was the deceased
brother of the plaintiff in that suit would not arise.
Madan Mohan Singh & Ors vs Rajni Kant & Anr on 13 August, 2010
21. Of course, in para.21 of the decision relied upon by Shri
T.M.Chandran in Madan Mohan Singh's case [AIR 2010 SC 2933] has
stated thus:
S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr on 28 April, 2010
Shri T.M.Chandran learned counsel for the appellants
submitted that the Judgment in S.Khushboo's case [JT 2010 (4) SC 478]
and that in Latha Singh v. State of U.P & Another [AIR 2006 SC 2522]
have been rendered under different circumstances.
R.F.A.No.146/2007 &
Section 497 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1