Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.36 seconds)

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Brahma Datt Sharma And Anr on 25 February, 1987

Ghislflrn Qhousc,and' another AIR 2004 SC I 46 7, Ulagappa and others vs. Divisional Commissioner, Mysore and others ZOONJO) SCC 639, State of U.P. vs. Brahrn Datt Sharma and another AIR 1987 SC 943 etc. ' J4. The reason why ordinarily a writ petition should not be entertained against a mere show-- cause notice or charge-sheet is that at. that stage the writ petition may be held to be premature. A rnere charge-sheet or show-cause notice does not give rise to any cause ofaction, because it does not amount to an adverse order which aflects the rights ofany party unless the same h_fl_as' been issued by a person having no jurisdiction to do so. It is quite possible that after considering the reply to the show-cause notice or after holding an enquiry the authority concerned may drop the proceedings and/or hold that the charges are not established. It is well settled that a writ lies when some right of any party is infringed. A mere show--cause notice or charge-sheet does not infiinge the right of any one. It is only when a final order imposing some punishment or otherwise adversely 'a]]"ecting a party is passed, that". the said party can be said to have any griejgance.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 967 - K N Singh - Full Document
1