Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)
Buta Ram Moti Ram vs The State on 27 July, 1976 cites

Firm Chironjilal Ramjibhai And Co. vs Chunarmal Motiram And Co. And Ors. on 24 February, 1975

In this behalf reference may be made to Firm Chironji lal Ramjibhai & Co. v. Chunarmal Motiram & Co. 1976 Cri LJ 437 Madh Pra, which says that Section 484 on its plain construction says that old Code shall apply to appeals, applications, trials, inquiry or investigation pending immediately before the date on which the New Code came into force. It does not save the old Code for the purposes of appeals or revision to be filed after the commencement of the New Code against the order passed in those pending proceedings.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Narain Mahton And Ors. vs Mahesh Prasad Singh And Ors. on 12 December, 1974

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that this is a revision petition arising out of an order passed in a case which was pending in the courts below before the enforcement of the Code of 1973 in which this new provision has been inserted that no revision petition shall lie against the interlocutory order. According to him, it is the old Code which would apply in the present case. He has tried to support his contention from Narain Mahton v. Mahesh Prasad Singh 1975 Cri LJ 1400 (Pat) in which the interlocutory order was passed in proceedings under Section 145 of the old Code before coining into force of the new Code and a revision petition was directed after the commencement of the new Code and the objection raised by the opposite party was that the revision petition was not maintainable being directed against an interlocutory order in view of provisions of Section 397(2) of the new Code and it was observed:
Patna High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1