Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)Section 195 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Santokh Singh vs Izhar Hussain And Anr on 25 April, 1973
14. Similarly, it has been held in Santokh Singh vs. Izhar Hussain AIR 1973
SC 2190 that every incorrect or false statement does not make an incumbent on the
No 59599/16
DALIP KUMAR JAMIAT RAM Vs. NARAIN DASS
Page No.6/7
court to order prosecution. The court has to exercise judicial discretion in the light
of all the relevant circumstances when it determines the question of expediency.
The court orders prosecution in the larger interest of administration of justice and
not to gratify feelings of personal revenge or to serve the ends of private party.
The Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Iqbal Singh Marwah & Anr vs Meenakshi Marwah & Anr on 11 March, 2005
8. The purpose of Section 195 and 340 of Cr.PC is to bar private prosecution
where the course of justice is sought to be subverted, leaving to the Court itself to
uphold its dignity and prestige. Accordingly, safeguard is given under Section 195
and 340 of Cr.PC in the form that any offence committed in course of the
proceedings in any Court can be taken cognizance of, only on a complaint made by
the Court in whose proceedings such offence had taken place. It has been held by
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Sachidanand Singh Vs. State of Bihar (1998
2 SCC 493) and in Iqbal Singh Marwah Vs. Minakshi Marwah and another
(Supreme Court, Criminal Appeal No. 402 of 2005) that the scope of
preliminary inquiry envisaged under Section 340 Cr.PC is to ascertain whether
the offence affecting the administration of justice has been committed in respect of
a document produced in the Court or given in evidence in a proceeding in that
Court.