Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.23 seconds)Section 18 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006
Steel Authority Of India Ltd vs Gupta Brother Steel Tubes Ltd on 9 September, 2009
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
P.R. Shah Shares & Stock Brokers (P)Ltd vs M/S. B.H.H. Securities (P) Ltd. & Ors on 14 October, 2011
21. These Judgments have been cited in support of the
arguments that the case on hand does not contain any grounds
contemplated under Section 34 of the Act and therefore
deserves to be sustained. The counsel for the 1st respondent
20/37
http://www.judis.nic.in
O.P.No.20 of 2010
would also rely upon the Judgment reported in 2012 (1) SCC
594 - P.R.Shah, Shares and Stock Brockers Private
Limited Vs. B.H.H. Securities Private Limited and others
to contend that this Court sitting under section 34 cannot re-
assess or re-appreciate the evidence on record. He would
therefore contend that the award is in order and cannot be
interfered with.
State Of Goa vs M/S Praveen Enterprises on 4 July, 2011
-Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral
proceedings in respect of a particular dispute
commence on the date on which a request for that
dispute to be referred to arbitration is received by
the respondent.”
26/37
http://www.judis.nic.in
O.P.No.20 of 2010
This provision clearly provides that Arbitral proceedings
are deemed to commence on the date when the respondent
receives a request from the petitioners to refer their disputes to
Arbitration (2012 (12) SCC 58 – State of Goa Vs. Praveen
Enterprises). Section 43 (1) clearly provides that the
Limitation Act would apply to arbitrations as it applies to
proceedings in Court.
J.C. Budhraja vs Chairman, Orissa Mining ... on 18 January, 2008
In the Judgment in J.C.Budhraja supra the Honorable
Supreme Court has held as follows:
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd vs M/S L.K.Ahuja & Company on 21 February, 2001
16. The learned Special Government Pleader would rely
upon the Judgement reported in 2004 (5) SCC 109 - Bharat
Coking Coal Ltd Vs. L.K.Ahuja, to contend that where price
escalation has been granted for the extended period then the
contractor cannot claim for loss of profit and overhead charges
especially when prices escalation has been granted for the
extended period.