Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.31 seconds)

Jameela & Ors vs Union Of India on 27 August, 2010

16. In the light of the above clause (d) of proviso to section 124A of the Railways Act. Supported his report submitted to the Sagar Police and registered a case in Crime No.0193/2018, the criminal act committed by his close associates Rajkumar Ahirwar and Prashant Rajak and they have played a role of conspiracy and took out something from the bottle like perfume and jokingly put it on his nose 8 and mouth and it smelt it and thereafter he lost consciousness and later he fell down from the running train. Therefore, it is not a case of untoward incident as he was not a bonafide passenger. The claimant failed to prove that he lost his right hand due to untoward incident. Section 125 prescribes application of compensation before the Claims Tribunal either u/s 124 or 124(A) by a person who has sustained injuries or suffered any loss. The term of "untoward incident" as used above fell for consideration before the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Jameela Vs. Union of India, (2010) ACJ 2453 (SC) on construing two provisions contained in Chapter VIII of the Railways Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 158 - A Alam - Full Document
1