Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.53 seconds)Section 41 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Union Of India (Uoi) vs D.S. Narula And Co. on 6 April, 1990
The said decision in the case of Union of India v. D. S. Narula and Co. (Civil Revision No. 33(H)/85) is overruled.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 21 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Firm Girdhar Mal Kapur Chand vs Firm Dev Raj Madan Gopal on 11 February, 1963
A Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the case of L. Charan Das v. L. Gur Saran Das, reported in AIR 1945 All 146 and a single Bench of Pepsu High Court in the case of Lal Chand v. Dev Raj, reported in AIR 1951 Pepsu 115, expressed similar view that against the appellate order passed in appeal as contemplated under Section 39 of the Act, revision petition to the High Court is competent.
Section 6 in The Scheduled Districts Act, 1874 [Entire Act]
L. Charan Das vs L. Gur Saran Das Kapur on 1 December, 1944
A Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the case of L. Charan Das v. L. Gur Saran Das, reported in AIR 1945 All 146 and a single Bench of Pepsu High Court in the case of Lal Chand v. Dev Raj, reported in AIR 1951 Pepsu 115, expressed similar view that against the appellate order passed in appeal as contemplated under Section 39 of the Act, revision petition to the High Court is competent.