Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)Section 376D in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Bihar State Electricity Board & Ors vs Rishi Raj & Anr on 21 July, 2015
20. Hence, the impugned judgement of conviction and sentence dated 17.03.2015 passed by the Fast Track Court, Court No. 1 (Offences against women)/ Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Ghaziabad in Sessions Trial No. 52 of 2014 (State vs Rishi and another), under sections 376-D and 506(2) IPC, police station Kavinagar, district Ghaziabad is hereby set aside.
Tameezuddin @ Tammu vs State Of (Nct) Of Delhi on 26 August, 2009
In 2005(15) Supreme Court Cases 566, Tameezuddin alias Tammu vs State (NCT of Delhi), the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that it is true that in a case of rape the evidence of the prosecutrix must be given predominant consideration, but to hold that this evidence has to be accepted even if the story is improbable and belies logic, would be doing violence to the very principles which govern the appreciation of evidence in a criminal matter. We are of the opinion that the story is indeed improbable. Thus, evidence of the victim and the documentary evidence and her statement recorded under section 164 have to be examined in the aforesaid light.
Musauddin Ahmed vs State Of Assam on 6 July, 2009
In (2009) 12 Supreme Court Cases 541, Musauddin Ahmad vs State of Assam, the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down that if there are serious contradictions in the deposition of the victim before the court and her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. and the conduct of the victim, consent can be inferred.
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1