Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)
Mahabir Singh Son Of Suraj Bhan vs State Of Haryana on 11 March, 2013 cites

Mansa Ram vs State Of Haryana And Others on 12 November, 2008

It follows, therefore, that each case must be considered according to its own facts and the Court must decide the particular CRA NO. D-367-DB of 2008(O&M) 12 circumstances of that case whether the provocation was grave and sudden, enough to permit an indulgent view of the crime committed by the accused. What a reasonable man i.e a normal person will do in certain circumstances depends upon the cultural, social and emotional background of the society to which the accused belongs. However, the court must consider the reaction not of the normal man in the abstract but the normal man whose impulses are conditioned by the same environment as the accused as laid down in Mansa Ram's case (supra).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Mahmood vs State on 17 November, 1960

In Mahmood v. State, AIR 1961 Allahbad 538, it was held by the Hon'ble Allahbad High Court that the Explanation at the end of the Exception is very important for it enjoins that the question whether provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from being murder should not be treated as a question of law, but one of fact and decided like any other question of fact.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1