Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.19 seconds)

Director Of School Education Madras And ... vs O. Karuppa Thevan on 31 January, 1994

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended relying on the decision of the Apex Court in Director of School Education, Madras v. O.Karuppa Thevan and Another (1994 Supp (2) SCC 666) that transfers should not be effected during the middle of an academic year. In the said decision, the Apex Court held that although there is no such rule, while effecting transfers, the fact that children of the employee are studying should be given due weight if the exigencies of the service are not urgent. Respondents 2 to 4 have stated that Ext.P1 order of transfer transferring out two Assistant Managers including the petitioner from the District Office of the Matsyafed at Alappuzha was issued with a view to improve the performance of the Alappuzha District Office. It is also stated that as against six Assistant Managers who are required to run the District Office, there are eight Assistant Managers, two Project Officers/Trainees and other supporting staff, even after the transfer of the petitioner and yet another Assistant Manager. It is also stated with reference to facts and figures that the performance of Alappuzha District Office has been the poorest among the 9 marine district offices in the State of Kerala and in such circumstance in order to improve the performance, the transfer was effected. The petitioner has not been WPC No.29712/2011 6 able to show that the said statement made in the counter affidavit is factually incorrect. Though the petitioner has attempted to justify the level of performance achieved in the Alappuzha District Office, in paragraph 9 of the reply affidavit, the petitioner has virtually conceded the fact that the performance of Alappuzha District Office when compared to other district offices is poor. He has also chosen to give various reasons for the poor performance. In such circumstances as the petitioner has virtually admitted the fact that performance of the Matsyafed District Office at Alappuzha is poor, it cannot be said that the exigencies of service must yield to the personal preference of the petitioner or that the transfer should be kept in abeyance until such time as the academic year comes to an end.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 256 - P B Sawant - Full Document
1