Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)
K. Vishnu Kumar Reddy, Member, Nellore ... vs Inspector General Of Registration And ... on 4 October, 2007 cites

Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan vs Nawab Zulfiquar Jah Bahadur And Ors. on 20 November, 1974

14. While deciding whether prima facie case is established or not for the purpose of granting temporary injunction, Courts are expected to examine the merits and demerits of the matter, but, however, that does not mean that a final adjudication of the dispute may have to be made at this stage, but, however, the Courts may have to look into whether prima facie case had been established. The views expressed in Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan v. Nawab Zulfikar Jah Bahdur also be glanced at in this context. In the Law of injunctions by Sri P.S. Narayana, J, at temporary injunctions, while dealing with factors to be considered for granting ex parte injunction, it had been specified as follows:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 3 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Sridhar Panda vs Taramani Dibya And Anr. on 30 June, 1997

In Sridhar Panda v. Taramani Dibya 1997 (2) Crl. L.J. 579, it was observed that the Courts may issue injunctions where the right, which is sought to be protected, is clear and unquestioned and not where the right is doubtful and there is no emergency and where the injury threatened is substantial and is irremediable otherwise. It is also an important rule that the conduct of the parties seeking injunction must not be tainted with unfairness and share practice. The principle function of an injunction is to furnish preventive action against irreparable mischief. An injury is deemed to be irreparable when having regard to the nature of the act and from the circumstances relating to the threatened harm, the apprehended damage cannot be adequately compensated with money.
Orissa High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1