Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)
Nisarga Nature Club vs Satyawan B Prabhudessai Ors on 31 May, 2013 cites

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 July, 2011

8. So far as Review Application No. 6/2013 is concerned, Learned Counsel Mr. Ritwick Dutta argued that the land survey no. 25/2 is surrounded by the notified forest and therefore, the part thereof could also be treated as a private forest in view of the contiguous nature thereof. He argued that the observations of the Hon'ble Apex Court in "T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India & Ors." have not been properly appreciated by this Tribunal. He further argued that when Respondent No. 1 - Shri Satyawan B. Prabhudessai had bulldozed area in excess of 2500 sq. mtrs. from the agricultural land, the report of the third expert committee should have been accepted in order to reach the conclusion that the part carved out of survey no. 25/2 for so called conversion was a private forest. He argued that the observation of Karapurkar Committee could not be taken as basis for exclusion of land survey no. 25/2 from the category of private forest.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 808 - S H Kapadia - Full Document
1