Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.48 seconds)Section 125 in The Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
Section 123 in The Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in The Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 177 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 182 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Rajani Kumari vs The State Election Commission Bihar & O on 16 March, 2017
9. The petitioner submitted her reply and
maintained her stand that the entire complaint is not
maintainable in the light of dictum laid down in case of Rajani
Kumari vs State Election Commission & Ors. reported in
2019(4) PLJR 673(FB) as there was no unimpeachable
evidence before 'the Commission' based upon which she could
be disqualified and secondly being in light of several evidences
also, since admittedly, the writ petitioner was above 21 years of
age on the date of scrutiny, she was qualified to contest the
election
Kanimozhi Karunanidhi vs A. Santhana Kumar on 4 May, 2023
If he could make oral objection, he could as
well, have made objection in writing against
the acceptance of nomination of the
Appellant, and in that case the Returning
Officer would have decided his objection
under sub-section (2) of Section 36, after
holding a summary inquiry. Even if it is
accepted that he had raised an oral
objection with regard to the educational
qualification of the Appellant be- fore the
Returning Officer at the time of scrutiny, the
respondent No. 1 has failed to make
averment in the Election Petition as to how
Appellant's nomination was liable to be
rejected by the Returning Officer on the
grounds mentioned in Section 36(2) of the
Act, so as to make his case fall under clause
Patna High Court CWJC No.18090 of 2023 dt.13-09-2024