cites: 110368264

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 37168

However, once the report is filed, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to accept the report or reject the same right at the threshold. Even after accepting the report, it has the jurisdiction to discharge the accused or frame the charge and put him to trial. But there are no provisions in the Code which empower the Magistrate to disturb the status of an accused pending investigation or when report is, filed to wipe out the report and its effects in law. Reference in this regard can be made to K. Chandrasekhar v. State of Kerala; Ramachandran v. R. Udhayakumar; Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab and Ors.; Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel and Ors. v. State of Gujarat; and Babubhai v. State of Gujarat.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 98 - A Pasayat - Full Document

However, once the report is filed, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to accept the report or reject the same right at the threshold. Even after accepting the report, it has the jurisdiction to discharge the accused or frame the charge and put him to trial. But there are no provisions in the Code which empower the Magistrate to disturb the status of an accused pending investigation or when report is, filed to wipe out the report and its effects in law. Reference in this regard can be made to K. Chandrasekhar v. State of Kerala; Ramachandran v. R. Udhayakumar; Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab and Ors.; Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel and Ors. v. State of Gujarat; and Babubhai v. State of Gujarat.

Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 169 - M K Mukherjee - Full Document

However, once the report is filed, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to accept the report or reject the same right at the threshold. Even after accepting the report, it has the jurisdiction to discharge the accused or frame the charge and put him to trial. But there are no provisions in the Code which empower the Magistrate to disturb the status of an accused pending investigation or when report is, filed to wipe out the report and its effects in law. Reference in this regard can be made to K. Chandrasekhar v. State of Kerala; Ramachandran v. R. Udhayakumar; Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab and Ors.; Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel and Ors. v. State of Gujarat; and Babubhai v. State of Gujarat.

Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 345 - S B Sinha - Full Document

However, once the report is filed, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to accept the report or reject the same right at the threshold. Even after accepting the report, it has the jurisdiction to discharge the accused or frame the charge and put him to trial. But there are no provisions in the Code which empower the Magistrate to disturb the status of an accused pending investigation or when report is, filed to wipe out the report and its effects in law. Reference in this regard can be made to K. Chandrasekhar v. State of Kerala; Ramachandran v. R. Udhayakumar; Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab and Ors.; Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel and Ors. v. State of Gujarat; and Babubhai v. State of Gujarat.

Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 116 - Full Document

However, once the report is filed, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to accept the report or reject the same right at the threshold. Even after accepting the report, it has the jurisdiction to discharge the accused or frame the charge and put him to trial. But there are no provisions in the Code which empower the Magistrate to disturb the status of an accused pending investigation or when report is, filed to wipe out the report and its effects in law. Reference in this regard can be made to K. Chandrasekhar v. State of Kerala; Ramachandran v. R. Udhayakumar; Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab and Ors.; Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel and Ors. v. State of Gujarat; and Babubhai v. State of Gujarat.

Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 511 - B S Chauhan - Full Document