Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 90 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 417 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Jayanti Rani Panda vs State Of West Bengal And Anr. on 16 June, 1983
In Jayanti Rani Panda vs. State of West Bengal (1984 Crl. L.J.1535) the facts were somewhat similar. The accused was a teacher of the local village school and used to visit the residence of the prosecutrix. One day during the absence of the parents of the prosecutrix he expressed his love for her and his desire to marry her. The prosecutrix was also willing and the accused promised to marry her once he obtained the consent of his parents. Acting on such assurance the prosecutrix started cohabiting with the accused and this continued for several months during which period the accused spent several nights with her. Eventually when she conceived and insisted that the marriage should be performed as quickly as possible, the accused suggested an abortion and agreed to marry her later. Since the proposal was not acceptable to the prosecutrix, the accused disowned the promise and stopped visiting her house. A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court noticed the provisions of Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code and concluded :-
Section 415 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Uday vs State Of Karnataka on 19 February, 2003
(ii) The above decision has been followed in 2003 (4) SCC 46 (Uday v. State of Karnataka) and in para-16, it is held as follows:
K.P.Thimmappa Gowda vs State Of Karnataka on 4 April, 2011
(iii) In 2011 SAR (Criminal) 367 SC (K.P.Thimmappa Gowda v. State of Karnataka), in para-13, it is held as follows:
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1