Shri Anil Hitkari And Hitkari Fires Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 8 April, 2005 2) Anil Hitkari Vs. CCE, Delhi 2005 (186) ELT (Tri.-Mum.) Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
M/S. H.V. Industrial Electronics Pvt. ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... on 20 July, 2006 9) H.V. Axler Ltd., Vs. CCE, Ranchi 2007 (215) ELT 70 (Tri.-Kol.) Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
Mothersons Sumi Systems Ltd. vs Cce on 30 August, 2006 3) Motherson Sumi System Ltd. Vs. CCE, Bangalore 2005 (192) ELT 402 (Tri.-Bang.) Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
M/S. Insulators & Electricals Company vs Cce, Bhopal on 12 February, 2001 3. Ld. SDR submits that the demand of interest in the impugned order is supported by the decision of the Tribunal in Insulators and Electrical Company Vs. CCE, Bhopal [2006 (202) ELT 734 (Tri.-Del.)]. Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
C.C.E., Bhopal vs M/S S.K. Industries on 8 May, 2001 4) CCE Bhopal Vs. D.K. Electrical Industries 2007 (215) ELT 208 (Tri.-Del.) Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document