Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.36 seconds)Sikkim Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1977
Janata Dal vs H.S. Chowdhary And Ors. on 28 August, 1992
In the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary which contains discussions on the philosophy, mechanics and purposes of Public Interest Litigation the Apex Court in paragraph 64 has observed as follows :
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs A Parent Of A Student Of Medical College. ... on 11 April, 1985
In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Parent of a Student of Medical College, Shimla the Hon'ble Supreme Court has cautioned that public interest litigation is a weapon which has to be used with great care and circumspection and the judiciary has to be extremely careful to see that under the guise of redressing a public grievance it does not encroach upon the sphere reserved by the Constitution to the executive and the legislature.
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 December, 2004
In paragraph 16 of the said judgment, the Apex Court has sounded a note of caution as follows (para 13 of AIR) :
State Of Sikkim vs Surendra Prasad Sharma on 19 April, 1994
21. Article 366(10) of the Constitution referred to above by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is in the following terms: