Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.35 seconds)Raj Kumar Karwal vs Union Of India And Ors.Withkirpal Mohan ... on 21 March, 1990
21. Learned counsel for the bank relied upon the decision
in Raj Kumar (supra). We are afraid that the decision is
rendered in a different fact situation.
Union Of India vs Shri Gopal Chandra Misra And Ors on 15 February, 1978
It is open to the employee, on
general principles, to withdraw his letter of
resignation. That is why, in some cases of public
services, this right of withdrawal is also made
subject to the permission of the employer. There is
no such clause here. It is not necessary to labour
this point further as it is well settled by the earlier
decisions of this Court in Raj Kumar v. Union of
India2, Union of India v. Gopal Chandra Misra 3
and Balram Gupta v. Union of India4.
Punjab National Bank vs P.K. Mittal on 13 February, 1989
15. Having regard to the interpretation placed by the
Supreme Court on Regulation 20(2) of the Punjab Nation
Bank Services Regulations, which provision is similar to the
one with which we are dealing with in the present case, we
20
wp.2277-19.doc
have no hesitation in observing that our task in deciding the
question that arises for consideration becomes relatively
easy and that in our opinion, the decision of the Supreme
Court in Punjab National Bank (supra) squarely applies to
the facts of the present case.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
Balram Gupta vs Union Of India & Anr on 1 September, 1987
It is open to the employee, on
general principles, to withdraw his letter of
resignation. That is why, in some cases of public
services, this right of withdrawal is also made
subject to the permission of the employer. There is
no such clause here. It is not necessary to labour
this point further as it is well settled by the earlier
decisions of this Court in Raj Kumar v. Union of
India2, Union of India v. Gopal Chandra Misra 3
and Balram Gupta v. Union of India4.
1