Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.72 seconds)
Nasir Ahmad And Ors. vs King-Emperor on 12 May, 1927 cites

Jagdat Tewari And Ors. vs Emperor on 2 January, 1920

Reports and Allahabad Law Journal, I do not feel myself bound to follow it, particularly when, in Ghariba v. Emperor [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 59, Mr. Justice Walsh, in delivering judgment, dissenting from this case noted that he had consulted Mr. Justice Ryves who delivered the judgment in Chander Sekhar's case [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 59, and that Mr. Justice Ryves had then agreed with his view Mr. Justice Walsh, in the judgment he delivered in the case of Jagdat Tewari v. Emperor [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 176 gave it as his opinion that the better procedure would be to record evidence for the prosecution in a case like that. He did not lay down any definite rule on the subject, and did not hold that it would be illegal not to record such evidence.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Chander Shekhar vs Emperor on 26 November, 1919

Reports and Allahabad Law Journal, I do not feel myself bound to follow it, particularly when, in Ghariba v. Emperor [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 59, Mr. Justice Walsh, in delivering judgment, dissenting from this case noted that he had consulted Mr. Justice Ryves who delivered the judgment in Chander Sekhar's case [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 59, and that Mr. Justice Ryves had then agreed with his view Mr. Justice Walsh, in the judgment he delivered in the case of Jagdat Tewari v. Emperor [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 176 gave it as his opinion that the better procedure would be to record evidence for the prosecution in a case like that. He did not lay down any definite rule on the subject, and did not hold that it would be illegal not to record such evidence.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Ghariba And Ors. vs Emperor on 29 October, 1923

Reports and Allahabad Law Journal, I do not feel myself bound to follow it, particularly when, in Ghariba v. Emperor [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 59, Mr. Justice Walsh, in delivering judgment, dissenting from this case noted that he had consulted Mr. Justice Ryves who delivered the judgment in Chander Sekhar's case [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 59, and that Mr. Justice Ryves had then agreed with his view Mr. Justice Walsh, in the judgment he delivered in the case of Jagdat Tewari v. Emperor [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 176 gave it as his opinion that the better procedure would be to record evidence for the prosecution in a case like that. He did not lay down any definite rule on the subject, and did not hold that it would be illegal not to record such evidence.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next