Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)

Phipson & Company Ltd. vs Gayco Private Limited on 27 January, 1976

In support of this, reliance is placed on Phipson & Co. Ltd. vs. Gayco Private Ltd., AIR 1977 Delhi 88, Lal Khosla vs. Randhir Khosla and another, 76 (1998) DLT 953 and Ravinder Kumar Rishi vs. Sushma FAO (OS) No.658/2009 Page 4 of 9 Rishi, 102 (2003) DLT 219. It is contended that the Court after the disposal of the Suit had become functus officio and thus, could not have passed such a direction. It is urged that once the suit is disposed of, the preparation of the decree thereon is a ministerial act and cannot be interdicted by any direction.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 4 - Y Dayal - Full Document

Ravinder Kumar Rishi vs Sushma Rishi on 23 August, 2002

In support of this, reliance is placed on Phipson & Co. Ltd. vs. Gayco Private Ltd., AIR 1977 Delhi 88, Lal Khosla vs. Randhir Khosla and another, 76 (1998) DLT 953 and Ravinder Kumar Rishi vs. Sushma FAO (OS) No.658/2009 Page 4 of 9 Rishi, 102 (2003) DLT 219. It is contended that the Court after the disposal of the Suit had become functus officio and thus, could not have passed such a direction. It is urged that once the suit is disposed of, the preparation of the decree thereon is a ministerial act and cannot be interdicted by any direction.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Dwaraka Das vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Anr on 10 February, 1999

8. The issue as to whether after disposal of a Suit the Trial Court either suo motu or on an Application moved can pass effective directions which are not corrections of clerical or arithmetical mistakes in the judgments, decrees or orders or errors arising therein from any accidental slip or omission in terms of Section 152 CPC is no longer res integra. The Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Dwarka Das vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1999 SC 1031 held:
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 202 - Full Document
1   2 Next