Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Article 18 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Raghwendra Sharan Singh vs Ram Prasanna Singh(Dead) on 13 March, 2019
NC: 2025:KHC:46130
CRP No. 715 of 2025
HC-KAR
by this Court in the cases of Sham Lal alias Kuldip
(supra); N.V. Srinivas Murthy (supra) as well as in
the case of Ram Prakash Gupta (supra),
considering the averments in the plaint, if it is
found that the suit is clearly barred by law of
limitation, the same can be rejected in exercise of
powers under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of
Civil Procedure."
Dahiben vs Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) ... on 9 July, 2020
"34. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhansuali supra
has held as follows in paragraph 23.3 "The
underlying objective Order 7 Rule 11(a) is that if
in a suit, no cause of action is disclosed, or the
suit is barred by limitation under Rule (d), the
court would not permit the plaintiff to
M/S. Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd. vs The Central Bank Of India on 5 June, 2020
Even in Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd. v. Central
Bank of India supra it is observed that clause (d)
makes, "it clear that if the plaint does not contain
necessary averments relating to limitation, the same is
liable to be rejected." As such, the question of
limitation for the purposes of Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC
cannot be refused to be considered in all cases on the
ground that it would always be a mixed question of fact
and law."
T. Arivandandam vs T. V. Satyapal & Another on 14 October, 1977
"13 ... In T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal &
Anr., this Court held that while considering an
application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, what is
required to be decided is whether the plaint
discloses a real cause of action, or something
purely illusory, in the following words:
Manipal University vs Sri Ramanjinappa H on 21 June, 2021
That the Trial Court misplaced the reliance placed by
the Defendant on Manipal University v. Ramanjinappa
H. (MANU/KA/2593/2021). The principles laid down in
the said judgment at paragraph 34 is reproduced
hereunder:
Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1