Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.17 seconds)

Shanker Lal Verma And 13 Ors. vs Rajasthan State Electricity Board on 11 September, 1998

The petitioner appeared in the selection to the post in question and submitted required documents to show possession of qualification. The petitioner obtained qualification of Prathama from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad. The aforesaid qualification has not been taken to be sufficient for the post of ANM. As per rules and in terms of advertisement, a candidate was required to possess the qualification of Secondary apart from other qualifications. The petitioner is not in possession of the qualification of Secondary. The qualification of Prathama was considered to be equivalent to Secondary prior to amendment in the rules. After amendment, said qualification is not considered towards eligibility and equivalent to Secondary. The issue in respect of same controversy was referred and decided by the Full Bench of this court in the case of Shankar Lal Verma & 13 Ors. Vs. 2 Rajasthan State Electricity Board, reported in 1999 (1) WLC (Raj.)-1. The relevant paras of the said judgment are quoted hereunder for ready reference:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 19 - Cited by 58 - P P Naolekar - Full Document
1