Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)Section 107 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 113 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 112 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Nahar Singh vs The State on 24 September, 1951
In this connection, the ruling reported in Nahar Singh v. The State, AIR 1951 Raj 150, has been cited by the applicants in revision.
Bhagwat Singh And Ors. vs State Through Udai Bhan Singh And Anr. on 2 March, 1959
In this connection, the applicants in revision have cited Bhagwat Singh v. State, AIR 1959 All 763. With all respect, I note that this judgment does appear to have stated the principle far too widely. I do not also, with all respect, agree with the Allahabad ruling that Sub-section (9) is limited by the proviso to Sub-section (4). The later sub-section is very wide and really enables a party to move the magistrate to issue summons for the attendance of any witness who may or may not be a person putting in an affidavit. The proviso to Sub-section (4) on the other hand, enables the magistrate to summon and examine a person who puts in an affidavit possibly where he finds the affidavit vague or one otherwise calling for some clearing.
1