Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.25 seconds)

State Of Haryana & Anr vs Deepak Sood & Ors on 15 July, 2008

2. The prosecution case as disclosed in the challan is that on receipt of DD no. 10A dated 07.02.2011, ASI Tahir Hussain along with State Vs Deepak and others 2 Constable Satbir went to the spot at B Block, Mangal Bazar Road Shochalya (toilet). Copy of DD no. 10A was also given to SHO Subhash Chand who went to the spot along with the staff at two storied Shochalya (toilet) at Mangal Bazar road, B Block, 800-900 wali gali and at first floor they found the dead body of a person aged 35-40 years old with head injuries and face smeared with blood. The crime team was called at the spot. The photographs of the spot and dead body were taken through photographer. The dead body was sent to BJRM hospital through Constable Satbir where MLC of the victim was recorded. From the spot, blood soaked earth, earth control, blood stained plastic sheet, two syringes and two small glass bottles were seized by the IO. On inquiry, from the neighbourhood, the name of the deceased was found to be Ashok. During the investigation conducted by SHO Inspector Subhash Chand the site plan was prepared. The victim was got identified by his elder brother who identified the deceased as Ashok @ Daroga and the brother of deceased also informed that deceased was habitual of taking intoxicant and he used to take the intoxicant with Jitender with his colleagues Deepak and Jitender @ Dharamveer @ Yamraj. During investigation, one Deen Mohd informed the IO that accused Deepak and Jitender were quarreling with deceased on 06.02.2011 in the night at 2.00 a.m. After collection of incriminating evidence, accused persons were arrested. Statements of witnesses u/S 161 Cr.P.C were recorded. The accused persons during investigation have pointed out the spot and have got recovered the blood stained bricks. The crime team report was received by IO during investigation and scaled site plan was got prepared. The postmortem report and opinion of doctor about cause of death was obtained. The exhibits were sent for examination to FSL Rohini and on completion of investigation, the accused persons were challaned to face trial for the offence u/S 302/34 IPC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 116 - Full Document

Balwinder Singh Alias Dalbir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 26 November, 1986

Sukhbasi and Ors. (AIR 1985 SC 1224); Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1987 SC 350); Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P. (AIR 1989 SC 1890). The circumstances from which an inference as to the guilt of the accused is drawn have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt and have to be shown to be closely connected with the principal fact sought to be inferred from those circumstances.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 138 - A P Sen - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Chatterjee vs State Of M.P. on 2 May, 1989

Sukhbasi and Ors. (AIR 1985 SC 1224); Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1987 SC 350); Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P. (AIR 1989 SC 1890). The circumstances from which an inference as to the guilt of the accused is drawn have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt and have to be shown to be closely connected with the principal fact sought to be inferred from those circumstances.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 350 - S R Pandian - Full Document

State Of U.P vs Ashok Kumar Srivastava on 14 January, 1992

In State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava, (1992 Crl.LJ 1104), it was pointed out that great care must be taken in evaluating circumstantial evidence and if the evidence relied on is reasonably capable of two inferences, the one in favour of the accused must be accepted. It was also pointed out that the circumstances relied upon must be found to have been fully established and the cumulative effect of all the facts so established must be consistent only with the hypothesis of guilt.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 654 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next