Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.55 seconds)

State Bank Of Travancore vs M/S Kingston Computers(I) P.Ltd on 22 February, 2011

16. The present complaint was filed by Sh.C.B. Sharma stated to be authorized representative of company but later on, other authorized representative were substituted to pursue this complaint. The minutes of the board authorizing Sh. Arun Kanchan C.E.O of the company to authorize any of the officer of the company to file or represent the complaint were not proved by the company. As per recent judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in State Bank of Travancore Vs. Kingston Computers (I) P.Ltd. III (2011) SLT 53, the letter of authority issued by the C.E.O of the company, was nothing but a scrap of paper.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 164 - Full Document
1   2 Next