Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)Mahatma Phule Agricultural University ... vs Nasik Zilla Sheth Kamgar Union And Ors on 24 July, 2001
19 The University has calculated the retrenchment compensation
as on 01.04.2001 and has paid the said amount. It is only after the
Honourable Supreme Court delivered it's judgment in 2001 in Mahatma
Phule Agricultural University (supra) that the University was required to
recalculate the retrenchment compensation. The fact that the University
::: Uploaded on - 18/11/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 19/11/2016 00:53:11 :::
*9* 6.wp.4193.16.1410.98.con
has not challenged the Industrial Court's judgment and has deposited the
compensation amount of Rs.16,728/-, which is strictly calculated in the
light of the observations of the Honourable Supreme Court in the
aforesaid judgment, leads to a conclusion that the said amount of
Rs.16,728/- should have been paid to the Workman in 2001. The same
was not paid and therefore, the Workman had preferred Complaint (ULP)
No.32/2002 before the Labour Court. The Labour Court had allowed the
complaint on the ground of insufficiency in compensation and since the
Workman had attained the age of superannuation prior to the judgment of
the Labour Court, it granted continuity of employment on notional basis
till the date of retirement so as to extend him the retiral benefits.
1