Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.23 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Manish Aggarwal vs Seema Aggarwal & Ors on 13 September, 2012
In the case of Manish Aggarwal vs. Seema Aggarwal (2012) 192 DLT
714, while relying upon Shah Babulal Khimji (supra), it was observed that
"as a measure of abundant caution we clarify that all orders as may be
passed by the Family Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 7 of
the said Act, which have a characteristic of an intermediate order and not
merely interlocutory order, would be amenable to the appellate jurisdiction
under sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the said Act".
Prateek Gupta vs Shilpi Gupta on 6 December, 2017
2. Prateek Gupta Vs. Shilpi Gupta 2017 SCC OnLine
SC 1421.
Section 7 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty vs Suman Sankar Bhunia on 21 September, 2023
In Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty (supra), the Petition under Article
227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the petitioner whose
Application for seeking permission to relocate along with the children to
United Kingdom, was dismissed by the Family Court. The learned Single
Judge concluded that the impugned order took its color from Section 26 of
the Act, 1890 and was appealable under Section 47(d). Even otherwise, it
Signature Not Verified
DigitallySigned By:SAHIL
SHARMA
CM(M) 2151/2023 Page 9 of 15
Signing Date:28.12.2023
17:02:25
had the attributes and trappings of finality and, therefore, was an appealable
order under Section 19 of the Act, 1984. Hence, it declined to entertain the
Writ under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.