Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.47 seconds)Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Velji Raghavji Patel vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 December, 1964
In the case of Velji Raghavji Patel Vs. The State
of Maharashtra, as reported in AIR 1965 S.C.
1433, it was held that an owner of property, in
whichever way he uses his property and with
whatever intention, will not be liable for
misappropriation and that would be so even if he is
not the exclusive owner thereof. A partner has
undefined ownership along with the other partners
over all the assets of the partnership. If he chooses to
use any of them for his own purposes he may be
accountable civilly to the other partners. But he does
not thereby commit any misappropriation."
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 156 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 405 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 409 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Smt. Shyamarani Garg & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 31 March, 2008
In "Smt. Shyamarani Garg & Anr. Vs. The State of
West Bengal & Anr." (CRR No.3391 of 2005), a Single
Judge of this Court in his Judgment dated 31.03.2008
relying upon the ratio in "Velji Raghavji Patel" (supra)
and certain other decisions quoted therein, had directed
quashing of the criminal proceedings against the
petitioners in that case, who were admittedly partners in
a business from which subsequently the complainant's
husband had retired, with the following observations -