Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.34 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd vs Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha on 19 November, 1979
In Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Mazdoor Sabha [(1980) 2 SCC 593 :
Section 7 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Parshotam Lal Dhingra vs Union Of India on 1 November, 1957
1999 SCC (L&S) 439] and reference was made to the development
of the law from time to time starting from Parshotam Lal
Dhingra v. Union of India [AIR 1958 SC 36 : 1958 SCR 828] to the
concept of 'purpose of enquiry' introduced by Shah, J. (as he then
was) in State of Orissa v. Ram Narayan Das [AIR 1961 SC 177] and
to the seven-Judge Bench decision in Samsher Singh v. State of
Punjab [(1974) 2 SCC 831 : 1974 SCC (L&S) 550 : (1975) 1 SCR 814]
and to post-Samsher Singh [(1974) 2 SCC 831 : 1974 SCC (L&S) 550
: (1975) 1 SCR 814] case-law. This Court had the occasion to make a
detailed examination of what is the 'motive' and what is the
'foundation' on which the innocuous order is based.
Section 12 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Dharam Singh on 2 February, 1968
In this regard, we deem it appropriate to refer to the
Constitution Bench decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Dharam Singh (supra), wherein it was categorically held that once
RAVI 2025.09.24
KANOJIA 17:05:07+05'30'
Item No.14/C-2 32 OA No.962/2020
the maximum period of probation is prescribed, it is absolute and
cannot be circumvented either by implication or administrative
device. The principle has been consistently followed.
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Punjab & Anr vs Shri Sukh Raj Bahadur on 22 February, 1968
This Court referred to the
averments contained in the pleadings of the parties, the judgments
in Parshotam Lal Dhingra v. Union of India [AIR 1958 SC 36 : 1958 SCR
828] , Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab [(1974) 2 SCC 831 : 1974 SCC
(L&S) 550 : (1975) 1 SCR 814] , State of Punjab v. Sukh Raj Bahadur [AIR
1968 SC 1089 : (1968) 3 SCR 234] , Union of India v. R.S. Dhaba [(1969) 3
SCC 603] , State of Bihar v. Shiva Bhikshuk Mishra [(1970) 2 SCC 871]
, R.S. Sial v. State of U.P. [(1975) 3 SCC 111 : 1974 SCC (L&S) 501 : (1974) 3
SCR 754] , State of U.P. v. Ram Chandra Trivedi [(1976) 4 SCC 52 : 1976
SCC (L&S) 542] and I.N. Saksena v. State of M.P. [AIR 1967 SC 1264 :