Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)Pradhani Jani vs The State Of Odisha on 15 May, 2023
This court has already directed vide order passed
B.A No.5668/24 & Conn. Cases -:19:-
in Pradhani Jani's case (supra) that all bail
applications filed by the different accused in the
same FIR should be listed before the same Judge
except in cases where the Judge has
superannuated or has been transferred or
otherwise incapacitated to hear the matter. The
system needs to be followed meticulously to avoid
any discrepancies in the orders.
Kusha Duruka vs State Of Odisha on 22 September, 2023
(vii) The directions of the Full Bench in Firos Ali's case (supra)
except direction No. (C) therein, will continue to remain, in view of the
observation in Kusha Duruka's case (supra).
Section 438 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Shahzad Hasan Khan vs Ishtiaq Hasan Khan & Anr on 28 April, 1987
9. The problem of successive bail applications of the same
accused being posted before different Judges was noticed in the
decision in Shahzad Hasan Khan v. Ishtiaq Hasan Khan and
Another [(1987) 2 SCC 684]. It was observed that if successive bail
applications on the same subject are permitted to be disposed of by
different Judges, there would be conflicting orders and a litigant would
be pestering every Judge till he gets an order to his liking resulting in
the credibility of the Court being at stake.
State Of Maharashtra vs Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao on 29 September, 1989
Later, in the decision in
State of Maharashtra v. Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao [1989
Supp (2) SCC 605], the aforesaid decision was followed and further
observed that the practice of placing subsequent applications before
B.A No.5668/24 & Conn. Cases -:15:-
the same Judge will bring in judicial discipline and consistency.
Jagmohan Bahl vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 18 December, 2014
In another judgment in Jagmohan Bahl and Another
v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another [(2014) 16 SCC 501] the
Supreme Court considered a case where anticipatory bail rejected by a
Sessions Judge was later granted by another Sessions Judge. In that
context, it was observed by the Supreme Court that the subsequent
application ought to have been placed before the same Sessions Judge
who had considered the earlier application.
Firos Ali vs State Of Kerala on 1 September, 2016
(vii) The directions of the Full Bench in Firos Ali's case (supra)
except direction No. (C) therein, will continue to remain, in view of the
observation in Kusha Duruka's case (supra).