Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)G.M. Tank vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 10 April, 2006
(iv) In G.M. Tank v. State of Gujarat and Ors. , the departmental enquiry and the criminal proceedings were based on the same set of facts, charges, evidence and witnesses. As there was no evidence against the employee to hold him guilty, the employee was honourably acquitted in the criminal trial during pendency of proceedings challenging dismissal and the findings to the contrary recorded in departmental proceedings in such case is unjust, unfair and oppressive and dismissal order was not sustainable.
K. Ganesha vs Department Of Telecom By Its Director ... on 21 January, 2004
(i) K. Ganesa v. Department of Telecom decided on 21.1.2004 O.A. 698 of 2003 C.A.T. Bangalore Bench.
Punjab National Bank And Ors.The Chief ... vs Sh. Kunj Behari Misra, Sh. Shanti Prasad ... on 19 August, 1998
In the case of Punjab National Bank and Ors. v. Kunj Behari Misra , Their Lordships have observed that "the principles of natural justice as we have already observed, required the authority which has to take a final decision and can impose a penalty to give an opportunity to the officer charged of misconduct to file a representation before the Disciplinary Authority records his findings on the charges framed against an officer," and hence the learned Counsel added that the respondents herein have not yet finalised the first charge sheet and hence the issue of second charge sheet in supersession of the first one is an effort to give the applicant the opportunity they needed to defend their case. The respondents Counsel added that the Tribunal cannot interfere at this stage as it is premature, in accordance with the decisions cited supra.
Section 18 in The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973
Union Of India (Uoi) Rep. By The ... vs Mr. A.K. Mathew And The Registrar, ... on 13 July, 2006
(i) Union of India v. A.K. Mathew and Ors. 2006 Writ LR 711, (Hon'ble High Court of Madras).
Muklesh Ali vs State Of Assam & Anr on 4 July, 2006
(iii) In Muklesh Ali v. State of Assam , the Hon'ble Supreme Court had quashed the notice issued the appellant forest officer seeking to open the departmental proceedings that had been concluded in his favour and the respondents were directed to consider him for promotion with other consequential benefits at the relevant point of time.
Ms. Monica Jawa vs Director Of Education on 12 February, 2004
(ii) Monica Jawa v. Director of Education decided on 12.2.2004 (High Court, Delhi) "where multiple charge sheets were issued, withdrawing the earlier ones, the last charge sheet was sustained."
1