Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)

Union Of India vs Association Of Unified Telecom Service ... on 24 October, 2019

We have carefully read paragraphs 349 to 364 of the aforesaid judgment, which are found under the head Right to Vote - A Constitutional/Fundamental Right and find that even though the Constitution Bench did not overrule or discard the ratio of the two three-Judges Bench judgments in Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (supra) and People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (supra), the opening line of para 362 tend to create a doubt whether the right of voter to exercise his choice for the candidate is a necessary concomitant of the voter's freedom of expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Therefore, this issue needs a clear exposition of law by a larger Bench. We are further of the view that width and amplitude of the power of the Commission under Article 324 needs further consideration by a larger Bench in the light of the judgments of this Court whereby the elector's right to be informed about the assets and antecedents of the persons seeking election to the legislature has been duly recognized.
Supreme Court of India Cites 116 - Cited by 86 - A Mishra - Full Document

People'S Union For Civil Liberties & Anr vs Union Of India on 16 December, 2003

We have carefully read paragraphs 349 to 364 of the aforesaid judgment, which are found under the head Right to Vote - A Constitutional/Fundamental Right and find that even though the Constitution Bench did not overrule or discard the ratio of the two three-Judges Bench judgments in Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (supra) and People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (supra), the opening line of para 362 tend to create a doubt whether the right of voter to exercise his choice for the candidate is a necessary concomitant of the voter's freedom of expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Therefore, this issue needs a clear exposition of law by a larger Bench. We are further of the view that width and amplitude of the power of the Commission under Article 324 needs further consideration by a larger Bench in the light of the judgments of this Court whereby the elector's right to be informed about the assets and antecedents of the persons seeking election to the legislature has been duly recognized.
Supreme Court of India Cites 110 - Cited by 601 - Full Document
1