Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.75 seconds)Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Madan Mohan Abbot vs State Of Punjab on 26 March, 2008
In Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab, (2008) 4 SCC
582, the Hon'ble Supreme Court emphasized and advised that in the matter
of compromise in criminal proceedings, keeping in view of nature of this
case, to save the time of the Court for utilizing to decide more effective and
meaningful litigation, a commonsense approach, based on ground realities
and bereft of the technicalities of law, should be applied.
Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
M/S Harchand Singh Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab Nd Ors on 20 May, 2016
7. It is apt to record herein that a three Judges Bench of the Apex
Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others reported in (2012) 10
SCC 303, explaining that High Court has inherent power under Section 482
of the Code of Criminal Procedure with no statutory limitation including
Section 320 Cr.P.C., has held that these powers are to be exercised to
secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process of any Court and
these powers can be exercised to quash criminal proceedings or complaint
or FIR in appropriate cases where offender and victim have settled their
dispute and for that purpose no definite category of offence can be
prescribed. However, it is also observed that Courts must have due regard
::: Downloaded on - 25/10/2019 20:24:59 :::HCHP
4 Cr. MMO No. 617 of 2019
to nature and gravity of the crime and criminal proceedings in heinous and
serious offences or offence like murder, rape and dacoity etc. should not be
quashed despite victim or victim family have settled the dispute with
.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Narinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 27 March, 2014
9. The Apex Court in case Narinder Singh and Ors. Vs. State of
Punjab and Others reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466 and also in State of
Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and Others (2019) 5 SCC 688 has
summed up and laid down principles, by which the High Court would be
guided in giving adequate treatment to the settlement between the parties
and exercise its power under Section 482 of the Code while accepting the
settlement and quashing the proceedings or refusing to accept the
settlement with direction to continue with criminal proceedings.
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Laxmi Narayan on 5 March, 2019
9. The Apex Court in case Narinder Singh and Ors. Vs. State of
Punjab and Others reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466 and also in State of
Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and Others (2019) 5 SCC 688 has
summed up and laid down principles, by which the High Court would be
guided in giving adequate treatment to the settlement between the parties
and exercise its power under Section 482 of the Code while accepting the
settlement and quashing the proceedings or refusing to accept the
settlement with direction to continue with criminal proceedings.
1