Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)

Shivaji Dayanu Patil & Anr vs Smt. Vatschala Uttam More on 17 July, 1991

We respectfully agree with the ratio laid down in the above case and in view of the fact admittedly the Insurance Company had not obtained leave from the tribunal before filing the above appeal. We are of the opinion that the appeal filed by the Insurance Company before the High Court was not maintainable in law. For the reasons mentioned above, this appeal succeeds, the judgment and order of the High Court dated 9.3.1998 is set aside and that of the Tribunal dated 24.6.1996 is restored. The appellants are entitled to costs in all the counts.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 282 - S C Agrawal - Full Document
1