Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 39 (0.55 seconds)The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Bhagubai vs General Manager, Central Railway, ... on 20 January, 1954
Madhya Pradesh High Court in Satiya (supra), and Sheela Bai Jain
(supra); Calcutta High Court in Subir Mukherjee (supra); Kerala High
Court in Thomman (supra), Philo (supra) and Thankamma (supra);
Bombay High Court in Bhagubai (supra) and Arti (supra); Madras
High Court in V. Komala (supra) and Rahmath (supra); Gauhati High
Court in Sabita Gope (supra); Karnataka High Court in Palaniyamma
(supra).
Varkeyachan vs Thomman on 8 September, 1978
Madhya Pradesh High Court in Satiya (supra), and Sheela Bai Jain
(supra); Calcutta High Court in Subir Mukherjee (supra); Kerala High
Court in Thomman (supra), Philo (supra) and Thankamma (supra);
Bombay High Court in Bhagubai (supra) and Arti (supra); Madras
High Court in V. Komala (supra) and Rahmath (supra); Gauhati High
Court in Sabita Gope (supra); Karnataka High Court in Palaniyamma
(supra).
Smt.Rita Devi & Ors vs New India Assurance Co.Ltd. & Anr on 27 April, 2000
34. This case is squarely covered by the principles laid down by the
Supreme Court in Rita Devi (supra) and this Court in Kanshi Ram
(supra), Shakeela Parveen (supra) and Shehzadi Yasmeen (supra);
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Philo And Ors. on 1 February, 1996
Madhya Pradesh High Court in Satiya (supra), and Sheela Bai Jain
(supra); Calcutta High Court in Subir Mukherjee (supra); Kerala High
Court in Thomman (supra), Philo (supra) and Thankamma (supra);
Bombay High Court in Bhagubai (supra) and Arti (supra); Madras
High Court in V. Komala (supra) and Rahmath (supra); Gauhati High
Court in Sabita Gope (supra); Karnataka High Court in Palaniyamma
(supra).
The General Clauses Act, 1897
Parle Products Limited vs Subir Mukherjee on 23 June, 2000
Madhya Pradesh High Court in Satiya (supra), and Sheela Bai Jain
(supra); Calcutta High Court in Subir Mukherjee (supra); Kerala High
Court in Thomman (supra), Philo (supra) and Thankamma (supra);
Bombay High Court in Bhagubai (supra) and Arti (supra); Madras
High Court in V. Komala (supra) and Rahmath (supra); Gauhati High
Court in Sabita Gope (supra); Karnataka High Court in Palaniyamma
(supra).
Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Ibrahim Mahommed Issak on 14 August, 1969
In the decision reported in Varkeyachan v. Thomman [1979
(1) L.L.N. 477] (vide supra), referred to already by us, this
Court has accepted the test laid down by Lord Summer
in Lancanshire and Yorkshire Railway v. Highly [1917 A.C.
352] and approved by the Supreme Court in the M.
Mackenzie v. I.M. Issak [(1969) 2 SCC 607 : A.I.R. 1970 S.C.
1906], in the case of a claim by the legal representatives of a
deceased workman which we may quote here usefully: