Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.37 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
42. To understand the test of perversity, it will also be
appropriate to refer to paras 31 and 32 from the judgment of this
Court in Associate Builders v. DDA, (2015) 3 SCC 49, which read
thus :
Ssangyong Engineering And ... vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 8 May, 2019
In the said decision too, the principles aforesaid in Delhi
Airport Metro Express (P) Ltd. v. DMRC, (2022) 1 SCC 131, Ssangyong
Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI, (2019) 15 SCC 131 and other cases
were referred to and thereafter, this Court applied the principles to the facts
of that case. We shall refer to the said decision later at an appropriate
juncture.
Uhl Power Company Ltd. vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh Multi ... on 7 January, 2022
31. As regards the limited scope of interference under Sections 34/37 of the
Act, we may also usefully refer to the following observations of a three-Judge
____________
Page 12 of 17
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2947 of 2024
Bench of this Court in UHL Power Co. Ltd. v. State of H.P., (2022) 4 SCC
116:
Mmtc Ltd. vs M/S.Vedanta Ltd. on 18 February, 2019
In MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd., (2019) 4 SCC 163, this Court took note of
various decisions including that in Associate Builders v. DDA, (2015) 3 SCC
1 (2024) 1 SCC 479
2 (2019) 4 SCC 163
3 (2015) 3 SCC 49
4 (2019) 15 SCC 131
5 (2023) 15 SCC 781
6 (2022) 1 SCC 131
7 (2022) 3 SCC 237
8 (2022) 4 SCC 116
9 (2022) 2 SCC 275
____________
Page 5 of 17
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2947 of 2024
49 and exposited on the limited scope of interference under Section 34 and
further narrower scope of appeal under Section 37 of the 1996 Act,
particularly when dealing with the concurrent findings (of the arbitrator and
then of the Court). This Court, inter alia, held as under:
Psa Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd. vs The Board Of Trustees Of V.O. ... on 28 July, 2021
28. The limited scope of challenge under Section 34 of the Act was once
again highlighted by this Court in PSA Sical Terminals (P) Ltd. v. V.O.
Chidambranar Port Trust, (2023) 15 SCC 781 and this Court particularly
explained the relevant tests as under :
Haryana Tourism Limited vs M/S Kandhari Beverages Limited on 11 January, 2022
In Haryana Tourism Ltd. v. Kandhari Beverages Ltd., (2022) 3 SCC 237,
this Court yet again pointed out the limited scope of interference under
Sections 34 and 37 of the Act; and disapproved interference by the High
Court under Section 37 of the Act while entering into merits of the claim in
the following words :