Union Of India & Anr vs Manik Lal Banerjee on 26 July, 2006
4 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 24-06-2019 02:20:10 :::
CWP-22295-2018 and other connected cases -5-
these posts, source and mode of recruitment, qualifications
and nature of work are entirely different. If the contention
of the Internal Auditors for claiming parity of pay scale
with that of Head Clerks merely on the ground that the post
of Internal Auditor was placed in Group XII, then if such
parity of pay scale may have to be extended to all other
posts, it would have huge financial implication on the
finance of the Board which is a service-oriented institution
owing to the consumers. As held in Union of India and
Another v. Manik Lal Banerjee (2006) 9 SCC 643, "it is
now a well settled principle of law that financial
implication is a relevant factor for accepting the revision of
pay."