Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.55 seconds)Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Passports Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Passports Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
The Passports Act, 1967
Thadevoose Sebastian vs The Regional Passport Office on 30 September, 2021
9. In the instant case, even though FIR was registered, the
investigation so far not completed. If so, following the ratio in
Thadevoose Sebastian's case and the decisions referred in paragraph
No.17 of the same, it could not be held that any criminal proceedings
pending against the petitioner within the meaning of section 6(2)(f)
OP(CRL.) NO. 324 OF 2025
15
2025:KER:40962
of the Passport Act. Therefore, for renewal of the passport of the
petitioner, permission of the court is not necessary.
Muhammed Ashraf vs Union Of India on 13 August, 2008
In Muhammed
v. Union of India and Others (2018 (4) KHC 945:2018 (2)
KLD 621), this Court had held that a criminal proceeding
is pending only when cognizance is taken and in the
absence of a final report filed in Court, a criminal case
cannot be treated as pending. It was also held that mere
registration of a crime does not invoke either S.6 or S.10 of
the Act, and the police verification report must mention
OP(CRL.) NO. 324 OF 2025
11
2025:KER:40962
the stage of the crime.
Mohamad Shafi vs Regional Passport Officer on 27 March, 2017
In the decision in
Mohamad Shafi v. Regional Passport Officer (2017 (2)
OP(CRL.) NO. 324 OF 2025
12
2025:KER:40962
KHC 484: 2017 (1) KLD 631 2017 (2) KLT 309: ILR
2017 (2) Ker. 589) this Court has held that Criminal Court
is vested with ample powers to issue directions for
providing passport for a specific period and the Magistrate
can fix the period for travelling abroad or even issue
directions to issue the passport for a specified period in
accordance with the facts and circumstances of each and
every case.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bavajee Fakkir Muhammed And Anr. vs The State Of Kerala And Anr. on 14 September, 1966
In Muhammed v. State of Kerala and Another
(2012 (4) KHC 553: 2012 (4) KLT 655: ILR 2012 (4) Ker.
835: 2013 (1) KLJ 185) it was held that the gravity of the
offence alleged cannot be the sole basis to decline
permission to go abroad for a short period and the
OP(CRL.) NO. 324 OF 2025
13
2025:KER:40962
Magistrate can allow the application to travel abroad by
imposing adequate safeguards for securing the presence of
accused for trial.