Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)R.L. Sethi vs Union Of India on 12 May, 2010
5. The petitioners contend that the application filed by Shri Bansi Dhar
for conversion had been accepted on 19.05.2000 and the respondent had
agreed to execute the conveyance deed on payment of the full conversion
charges. It is contended that since the conversion charges had been paid in
full, the respondent was obliged to execute the conveyance deed. The
petitioners further contend that in terms of the circular dated 26.03.2001
further demands of misuse charges etc. could not be raised after the
substitution and the respondent could only collect the charges as demanded
prior to substitution. The petitioners relied upon the decision of a
Coordinate Bench of this Court in R. L. Sethi v. Union of India: (2010)
170 DLT 159 in support of their contention.
1