Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 52 (0.79 seconds)Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 50 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002
Section 4 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 239 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022
Subsequently, a person
unconnected with the offence of extortion may assist the
said accused in the concealment of the proceeds of
extortion. In such a case, the person who assists the
accused in the scheduled offence for concealing the
proceeds of the crime of extortion can be guilty of the
offence of money-laundering. Therefore, it is not
necessary that a person against whom the offence under
Section 3 PMLA is alleged must have been shown as the
accused in the scheduled offence. What is held in para
81
2025:JHHC:34679
135 of the decision of this Court in Vijay Madanlal
Choudhary v. Union of India, (2023) 12 SCC 1] supports
the above conclusion. The conditions precedent for
attracting the offence under Section 3 PMLA are that
there must be a scheduled offence and that there must
be proceeds of crime in relation to the scheduled offence
as defined in clause (u) of sub-section (1) of Section 3
PMLA..