Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 52 (0.79 seconds)

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022

Subsequently, a person unconnected with the offence of extortion may assist the said accused in the concealment of the proceeds of extortion. In such a case, the person who assists the accused in the scheduled offence for concealing the proceeds of the crime of extortion can be guilty of the offence of money-laundering. Therefore, it is not necessary that a person against whom the offence under Section 3 PMLA is alleged must have been shown as the accused in the scheduled offence. What is held in para 81 2025:JHHC:34679 135 of the decision of this Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India, (2023) 12 SCC 1] supports the above conclusion. The conditions precedent for attracting the offence under Section 3 PMLA are that there must be a scheduled offence and that there must be proceeds of crime in relation to the scheduled offence as defined in clause (u) of sub-section (1) of Section 3 PMLA..
Supreme Court of India Cites 580 - Cited by 293 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next