Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.25 seconds)
Dileep Damodaran vs Govt. Of A.P. Rep. By Its Secretary To ... on 6 November, 1990 cites

Dr. Ambesh Kumar Etc. Etc vs Principal, Llrm Medical Collegemeerut ... on 19 December, 1986

Similarly in Chitra Lekha v. State of Mysore, , Ambesh Kumar v. Principal, LLRM Medical College, Meerut, and G.Padmaja v. University of Health Sciences, 1990 (1) ALT 375 the same principle has been upheld that the State Government may lay down eligibility qualification for admission to such courses in the Medical Colleges in accordance with the regulations made by the Indian Medical Council.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 21 - B C Ray - Full Document

Dr. Dinesh Kumar & Ors vs Motilal Nehru Medical College ... on 1 May, 1985

In Dinesh Kumar v. Motilal Nehru Medical College Allahabad, AIR 1986 SC 1877:1987 All LJ 189 the Supreme Court upheld the principle of reservation on all India basis of 15% of total seats for MBBS/ BDS Courses and 25% for Post-graduate Courses fixed and held that the extent of such reservations depends on several factors including opportunities for professional education in a particular area, the extent of competitive level of education development of the area and other relevant factors and, therefore, it is open for the State Government to take a decision with regard to the extent of reservations keeping in view the needs of the particular area and other relevant factors governing the matter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 201 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Devkumarsinghji Kasturchandji vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. on 13 October, 1966

In D. Kasturchandji v. State, and Sheo Varan Singh v. State, it has been held that the expression 'for the time being in force' means not only the law which is in existence at the time when a particular Act is promulgated but all future Acts also and, therefore, the overriding effect is given over all such laws which may come in future and which may be for the time being in force. Moreover, the expression 'notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other taw for the time being in force' is in the nature of a non obstante clause and therefore the clear cut effect of such a clause is that the provisions of the Act shall prevail over any other provision contained in any Act which may be for the time being in force.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 12 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next