Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.26 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004
Section 43 in Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 [Entire Act]
The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956
Section 39 in Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 [Entire Act]
Section 40 in Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 [Entire Act]
Section 44 in Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 [Entire Act]
Section 77 in Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 [Entire Act]
Nazir Ahmad vs Emperor (No. 2) on 16 June, 1936
13. Law is well settled that when the statute requires to do
certain thing in certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not
at all. Other methods or mode of performance are impliedly and
necessarily forbidden. The aforesaid settled legal proposition is based
on a legal maxim "Expressio unius est exclusion alteris", meaning
thereby that if a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular
manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other
manner and following other course is not permissible. (See Taylor v.
Taylor, (1876) 1 Ch.D.426; Nazir Ahmed v. King Emperor, AIR
1936 PC 253; Ram Phal Kundu v. Kamal Sharma; and Indian
Bank's Association v. Devkala Consultancy Service, AIR 2004 SC
2615).