Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.33 seconds)
Sh. Anurag Aggarwal vs The New India Assurance Company Ltd on 25 October, 2012 cites

Sudir Engineering Company vs Nitco Roadways Ltd. on 23 March, 1995

53. PW1 was also suggested that the defendant replied to its no­ tices. Thus the notices, the exhibition of which was objected to by the defendant, stand proved by necessary implication. Even otherwise the exhibition or marking is only a nomenclature and not a symbol of proof as held in Sudhir Engineering Company vs. Nitco Roadways Ltd. 1995 (34) DRJ 86. The fact of the matter is that as held above the tenancy has come to an end by efflux of time and it was a month to month tenancy which was further determined by the respective plain­ tiffs by a notice, which otherwise was also not required as there was no subsisting lease between the parties.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 244 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1   2 Next